🔗 Share this article

Only two days before the New York race for mayor, political analyst Michael Lange made a bold electoral prediction – going beyond the winner overall, and block by block. Lange, an expert in elections who grew up in the city, devoted over a decade in progressive politics and has become a kind of local celebrity recently for his thorough analyses into municipal statistics and polling.

He published his extremely precise prediction map – which correctly forecast that Zohran Mamdani was victorious while missing the independent candidate’s solid showing – on his Substack, his platform. Lange possesses a talent for witty coinages. He pointed out, for instance, the split between the “commie corridor”, running from Park Slope to Bushwick to Astoria, where he forecasted (correctly) that the left-wing candidate would win by huge margins, and the “capitalist corridor” on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. There, “the Free Press and financial newspapers outrank the New York Times” in audience and most voters leaned toward Cuomo, campaigning as a conservative-courting independent.

Voting Day Trends and Unexpected Results

How was your election night?

I had to do that because they were dropping around 200,000 ballots into the tally frequently! I felt a little nervous at the beginning: Mamdani led the early vote by 12 points, but came two big batches of ballots added after that and his lead dropped from 12 to 8%. I was worried.

Understand, it was possible where election day went somewhat badly for Mamdani, where the opponent was going to end up essentially increasing his support from the Democratic primary. However Mamdani added 500,000 supporters to his primary coalition, and that’s a huge reason why he succeeded. He went out and greatly broadened his base from the primary.

Coalition Building

Where did Mamdani gain additional support from?

He assembled the coalition that the left long aimed for: it’s multiracial, it’s young, tenants and individuals facing cost pressures. He gained considerably with minority communities, everyday New Yorkers, compared to the earlier election. Additionally he further maximized his base of liberal progressives, young leftists, and immigrant groups. He couldn’t have won without making those significant inroads.

He built the coalition that the left always wanted to build: diverse, young, tenants and people squeezed by affordability

There were also a number of Trump/Mamdani voters – is that a big trend?

It is a real thing, limited to working-class Latinos, Asian communities and Muslims. Electors in immigrant strongholds that supported the former president last year backed the progressive now. But it’s not that he was gaining Caucasian laborers and Maga voters.

Turnout and Impact

A major development of the night was the record turnout. Who did that help?

Each candidate. Participation was significantly higher than anticipated. I figured we might go over two million, but it reached 2.3 million – that is a lot of darn voters. Existed a decent anti-Mamdani block, who were motivated, but the Mamdani base was also motivated, and that was enough to secure victory.

You forecasted he’d exceed 50% of the vote. Is he on course for that?

Currently it appears he’s favored to surpass 50%. He has 50.4% but remain probably 200K ballots left to report at that time. Thus I don’t think certain, but I think probable, and I wish he does because then no one can say the Republican was a spoiler.

Republican Collapse

The GOP candidate, the Republican candidate, was another surprise. His vote completely collapsed.

He lost any district in any area. Not even one neighborhood in Staten Island, which is like an 88% Trump area. That really was unexpected. The independent kept Caucasian districts, affluent zones and devout communities, and plus gained many Republicans on Staten Island who had a strong turnout. I think there was a lot of strategic balloting by GOP voters. They were doing it prior to the former president endorsed for the candidate, but that definitely helped. It might have changed the outcome unless Mamdani’s coalition hadn’t grown.

Progressive Strongholds

Regarding your often-discussed “commie corridor” – did backing for Mamdani overwhelming in those areas of the boroughs?

I think existed a little dilution of the commie corridor in certain places like Astoria or Greenpoint that have more older white ethnic folks. In Astoria, for example, the Greek landlords and residents all went for the independent. So there existed a little resistance. However overall, largely the commie corridor is a key factor why Zohran won – he scored between 77% and 83% in specific neighborhoods.

Community Support

In the lead-up to the vote we reported on whether the candidate was making inroads with Jewish New Yorkers. Any indication that he did?

There are areas with a lot of secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – like specific locales – where he did well. But in the affluent districts like the Manhattan area, his position on Israel definitely mattered there. Similarly in the moderate communities including Queens neighborhoods, or Bronx areas – they all leaned Cuomo. And also, there are newcomers from Eastern Europe in the borough, they were pretty staunchly supportive. Therefore I don’t know if existed crazy narrative-busters here, but Mamdani retained more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and even parts of the another locale by big margins.

Long-Term Significance

Did Mamdani redefine what the city represents in politics? Will the progressive base serve as a springboard for progressive contenders?

Yes, it’s not accidental that some of the biggest political leaders from progressives hail from a few areas in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I’m sure that we’ll see additional examples – people will emerge from these neighborhoods to be promoted to higher office.

However I think that each urban center in America could develop similar progressive hubs. Urban places are the centers of progressive influence in America – since they’re young, tenancy is common and they are places where people are crushed by the inequalities we face.